|

GM's Deadly Duo
Chevrolet introduced its
sporty Camaro in the fall of 1966 as General Motors' entry in the race
to entice America's emerging youth market away from Ford's overnight success,
the Mustang. Thirty-five years and four design generations later,
the Camaro and its Pontiac companion, the Firebird, have emerged as undisputed
champions in at least one category: they are the deadliest cars on
the road.
Insurance industry researchers
figure that 89 persons were killed per "million registered vehicle years"
from 1995 through 1998, but that for the Camaro, the rate was well over
three times higher – 308 per million. The Camaro convertible and
Firebird did not lag far behind. Together, these three models make
up what GM calls its F-Cars.
The fatality data published
in an August 2000 "Driver Death Rates Status Report" by the Insurance Institute
for Highway Safety (IIHS), are
based on a survey by the Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI) of crash death
records for 156 passenger vehicle models. Sports cars, particularly
GM's, led the field in fatalities.
"This has been true model
year after model year," the Institute reported, noting that its 1997 survey
had also showed the Camaro leading all passenger cars in the rate at which
occupants and drivers were killed from 1992 through 1996. The carnage
is the offspring of the marriage of poor crash design with the nation's
most at-risk motorists.
Ejection Hatches
A major GM selling-point
from 1982 to 1992 was the F-Car's large glass hatch-back that projects
over the back seat of the car, adding to its sporty appearance. The design
presents a special hazard. In collisions, this large sheet of glass
is likely to break or pop out of its frame, providing a ready hatch through
which to eject anyone not securely belted in the seat. This is especially
hazardous to children and in cars equipped with only lap belts.
Why F-Cars Are So Deadly
On its own web site, GM touts
the importance of having a "safety cage" to protect the driver and passengers
in a collision. This "cage" consists of pillars, roof, and side-door
beams made of high-strength reinforced steel, designed to remain crash
forces intact and protected from vehicles' front and rear "crumple zones."
during a collision.
Ironically, GM's F-Cars--known
as "muscle cars"--have no such safety cage. The vehicles' "unibody"
design lacks structural integrity. The cars are weak where even GM
advertises they most need to be strong. Actually, GM's "muscle cars"
are dangerously flabby. The unibody construction does not resist
torquing, bending and twisting, and does not prevent hazards from penetrating
the passenger compartment. Most deficient of all are the so-called
T-Top convertibles models. When major sections of the roof are removed,
the car loses an important element of its "cage" structure and the passenger
compartment itself becomes a "crumple zone."
Marketing Death to Young
Drivers
General Motors not only created
the deadliest cars on the road, but directly markets them to drivers in
the age groups that have the nation's highest fatality rates – those 16
to 20, 21 to 24, and 25 to 34, according to the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration's "Traffic
Safety Facts 1999." GM has promoted the Camaro and Firebird to these
young drivers for three and a half decades with advertising appeals that
virtually challenged them with the lure of the high-stakes hazard:
| • |
"This
is the spirited way to challenge the Road...Just ask the kid who owns one!" |
| |
|
| • |
"Make
the earth move" |
| |
|
| • |
"Here's the shape that turns
heads and quickens heartbeats." |
| |
|
| • |
"A legend that can make
you look good, even when it's standing still." |
Designed To Kill
Combining the highest risk
population with the highest risk cars is a formula for death. Given
the combination, it is little wonder that GM's F-Cars are the most efficient
killers on America's roads, yet it is unlikely that their hazardous designs
will be removed from the marketplace or that the roadway carnage will be
reduced unless and until the marketplace or federal regulators force auto-makers
to take such steps.
(03/08/01)
|